Identify the legal counterparties
Record the legal buyer, seller, and any other parties your policy requires. Keep a transaction reference with each check.
OFAC screening for real estate transactions
Run sanctions checks on the buyers and sellers in your property deal. Review possible matches and save the reasons for each choice. Add a new check when the buyer or seller changes.
Paid plans start at $59/month for 5,000 checks each month. API and review dashboard included. See pricing.
Client acceptance review
Keep the screening attached to the engagement.
Built around your work
A company may replace the person who made the first offer. The original buyer’s check does not describe the new legal purchaser. Your file needs both the history and the current party list.
Record the legal buyer, seller, and any other parties your policy requires. Keep a transaction reference with each check.
Compare company names and registry IDs with source facts. Similar addresses or trading names alone do not prove it is the same person or company.
Keep the facts behind the check and review reasons with the deal. Handle ownership, payment, and other property checks separately.
Put it into practice
A property transaction can change legal buyers before completion. The screening record must keep pace with the actual parties.
The coordinator links distinct results to one deal. The team can see which checks describe current parties and which are historical.
Confirm the legal parties in the current transaction. Collect known names and IDs, and list any required related people.
Run the selected checks and assign possible matches to review. A source failure leaves a check incomplete.
Update the party list when the deal changes. Save each new result and complete the approvals required for the transaction.
In a fictional sale, a person makes the first offer. Later, Example Alder Property Ltd. becomes the buyer. The team records the company as the new purchaser and keeps the old person’s check as history. It also lists any owners or other parties that now need checks.
A possible match has a similar trading name and a different address. The reviewer compares registry evidence and the complete source entry. A shared address or a name similarity alone cannot settle identity. Record what remains uncertain and leave transaction approval with the authorized team.
Scroll horizontally to compare every column.
| Work item | Screening evidence | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer substitution | New legal-party record and screening. | The original buyer’s result remains historical. |
| Identity comparison | Source facts and permitted document references. | Company screening does not discover all beneficial owners. |
| Transaction file | Current parties, screening IDs, and case reasons. | Property, payment, and reporting controls remain separate. |
Start free with 250 live screenings. Use them in the API or dashboard. Your first workspace gets this allowance once, with no monthly reset. No credit card is needed.
Try an individual buyer and a replacement company with facts your team may share. Ask your team to find the latest result and past checks for each party. Review a case with a missing registry ID.
The optional demo uses made-up records for a quick tour. Use the sandbox to test errors without using live checks.
Confirm the sources, reviewer access, and retention your file needs. Count each required person or company when estimating usage. The product does not discover company owners or verify title to the property; those checks remain in your wider process.
Use the transaction reference to connect the buyer, seller, and other selected parties. Give each legal identity its own result. This helps a colleague distinguish a new company buyer from the person who arranged the original offer.
Your team may need outside records to check ownership or other facts about the deal. Keep those tasks in the file. A lender’s check may cover only some of the parties you need to assess. A no-match tells you about the lists checked; it does not approve the sale.
TRY IT WITH YOUR TEAM
Check your sources, try a free live check and estimate your monthly cost.
Find your required sources, what they cover and when they were refreshed.
Explore coverageUse your free live checks to find possible matches. Compare the evidence and save a decision.
Start with 250 free checksCount new checks, rows in uploaded lists and repeat checks from monitoring.
See workload examples
Evaluate the fit
Yes, when the new legal party is required by your policy. A replacement company or person does not inherit the earlier buyer’s result. Keep the old check as history and link the new one to the transaction.
No. Your due-diligence process supplies the relevant owners and legal entities. Screen the parties it requires as distinct subjects. Ownership research and property-title checks remain separate.
Not always. Find out who it checked, which lists it used, and when it ran. Compare that scope with the current parties in your deal. Your team’s policy sets the checks it still needs.
Yes. Give each required person or company its own subject details and screening, with a shared transaction reference in your records. Make the role clear so reviewers do not confuse the parties.
No. It describes a completed check against chosen sources. Ownership, payment, property, reporting, and other required checks still need their own assessment and approval.
See SanctionsKit in action
Start with 250 free live checks. Use the API or dashboard to review matches and save decisions. Choose a paid plan when you need more checks.