Choose the sources for the question
Review the coverage directory and select available lists deliberately. Financial sanctions and export-control records remain identifiable in the result.
Restricted-party screening for international trade
Bring restricted-party screening into supplier and buyer review. Keep financial sanctions, export-control lists, and the evidence behind each potential match distinguishable.
API and compliance dashboard included in every plan.
A chain of trading relationships
Party screening is one part of an export review.
Built around your work
A supplier or distributor may need review against sources with different purposes. SanctionsKit preserves authority and list identity so your team can inspect a match in context and route it to the people responsible for the relevant restriction.
Review the coverage directory and select available lists deliberately. Financial sanctions and export-control records remain identifiable in the result.
Screen a supplier, buyer, or distributor file in batches. Keep each row’s outcome and errors visible as the work progresses.
Retain selected relationships for rescreening when source evidence changes, with plan caps and a defined review process.
A practical use case
A procurement or export team needs to know who it is dealing with and what a source listing actually means. Sanctions, denied-party, and export-related lists can serve different purposes.
The review challenge
Treating every list hit as the same kind of restriction makes escalation harder and hides the scope of the check.
Screen each supplier, distributor, or buyer with explicit coverage. Inspect the authority, list identity, and available restriction context before applying your own trade policy.
Identify the supplier, buyer, distributor, and other subjects your policy requires. Keep their legal names and known identifiers distinct.
Check each source’s current availability and purpose. Use a versioned package or explicit source IDs for the screening request.
Route potential matches with their source evidence. Combine the outcome with your separate product, end-use, destination, and licensing analysis.
Evaluate the fit
No. It compares the submitted party against selected lists. Product classification, end use, destination, ownership, and licensing decisions require separate analysis.
Yes. Submit each person or organization as its own subject, individually or in a batch. Preserve its selected coverage and result so reviewers know which party was screened.
See SanctionsKit in action
Try the interactive demo with synthetic examples. Compare plans for your team’s screening volume.