Sanctions screening for ecommerce businesses

Screen the business party your policy actually needs.

Connect selected customer, merchant, supplier, and recipient screening to your ecommerce operations with clear identity roles and a reviewable result history.

API and compliance dashboard included in every plan.

SanctionsKitIllustrative workflow

Seller & partner review

WorkflowNext step
Individual sellerReview identity
Business merchantCompare source facts
Existing partnerRevisit the relationship
Keep every seller attached to its result.

API requests and portfolio batches share the review workflow.

One screening workflow across your seller base

Built around your work

An order has more than one useful name field.

A storefront brand, legal seller, purchaser, delivery contact, and refund recipient may represent different identities. Searching whichever name is easiest to extract can leave the intended party unchecked or attach a candidate to the wrong person.

Define the identity behind the order

Map legal parties and policy-defined roles before integration. Do not assume a shipping address verifies the person or organization behind the purchase.

Keep order exceptions understandable

Connect candidates to the original identity and source evidence. Give the reviewer an order reference without exposing unrelated customer details.

Use clear application states

Handle completed no matches, candidates, and incomplete checks separately. A checkout timeout must not become automatic screening clearance.

A practical use case

Screen the business party your policy actually needs.

Connect selected customer, merchant, supplier, and recipient screening to your ecommerce operations with clear identity roles and a reviewable result history.

The review challenge

A storefront brand, legal seller, purchaser, delivery contact, and refund recipient may represent different identities. Searching whichever name is easiest to extract can leave the intended party unchecked or attach a candidate to the wrong person.

How SanctionsKit helps

Map legal parties and policy-defined roles before integration. Do not assume a shipping address verifies the person or organization behind the purchase. Connect candidates to the original identity and source evidence. Give the reviewer an order reference without exposing unrelated customer details.

Put it into practice

Choose the relevant workflow

Explore source coverage
  1. 01

    Choose the relevant workflow

    Define which customer, seller, supplier, or recipient relationships need screening and when. Avoid collecting unnecessary personal data merely to populate extra fields.

  2. 02

    Screen the known legal identity

    Use compatible sources and reliable identifying details. Preserve coverage and source versions with the result.

  3. 03

    Record the next action

    Keep identity decisions separate from fulfillment, refund, fraud, export, and other business controls. Revisit changed parties under policy.

Evaluate the fit

Screening questions for ecommerce.

Does this screen products for export restrictions?

No. It does not classify goods or determine destination, end-use, licensing, or customs requirements.

Is payment-provider approval a complete sanctions check for our order?

Do not assume that. Determine the provider’s actual scope, available evidence, and what remains your organization’s responsibility.

Can we screen suppliers as well as customers?

Yes, as distinct supported subjects with coverage selected under your policy. Keep the internal relationship role and reference.

Does screening replace fraud checks?

No. Name and entity comparisons do not verify payment ownership, detect account takeover, or authenticate a delivery request.

See SanctionsKit in action

Explore screening and review for ecommerce.

Try the interactive demo with synthetic examples. Compare plans for your team’s screening volume.