Choose the required coverage
Select the sources your institution’s policy requires. Preserve source versions and keep unavailable coverage distinct from a completed no-match result.
OFAC screening for credit unions
Keep member screening connected to review.
Screen members and selected related parties against defined sources. Keep account-opening checks, analyst decisions, and later changes in one retained history.
API and compliance dashboard included in every plan.
SanctionsKitIllustrative workflow
Customer relationship review
Customer
Related entity
Separate subjects. Traceable results.Coverage · matched evidence · review notes
Ownership and wider due diligence need their own review.
Built around your work
A member relationship lasts longer than the first check.
Account-opening information can be corrected and source records can change. A detached search result leaves the next reviewer without the member context, source version, or reasoning behind an earlier dismissal.
Review the actual identity evidence
Compare member details with each candidate, including dates and identifiers at their known precision. Record per-match reasoning and required independent review.
Keep changes assigned
Connect selected members to ongoing monitoring and give new evidence or screening failures a clear owner. A notification acknowledgment does not close a linked investigation.
A practical use case
Keep member screening connected to review.
Screen members and selected related parties against defined sources. Keep account-opening checks, analyst decisions, and later changes in one retained history.
The review challenge
Account-opening information can be corrected and source records can change. A detached search result leaves the next reviewer without the member context, source version, or reasoning behind an earlier dismissal.
How SanctionsKit helps
Select the sources your institution’s policy requires. Preserve source versions and keep unavailable coverage distinct from a completed no-match result. Compare member details with each candidate, including dates and identifiers at their known precision. Record per-match reasoning and required independent review.
- 01
Map the member and relationship
Use a stable member reference and identify which people or organizations your policy requires the team to check. Keep identity verification and ownership diligence separate.
- 02
Screen and review exceptions
Submit the known facts through the API or dashboard. Route candidates and incomplete checks to different operational paths with the retained screening reference.
- 03
Maintain the evidence
Retain the source context, decision, and approvals under the institution’s approved policy. Revisit the comparison when member or source facts change.
Evaluate the fit
Screening questions for credit unions.
Does this replace a credit union’s BSA/AML program?
No. SanctionsKit supports selected-source screening and review. It does not perform the full customer-identification, transaction-monitoring, reporting, or governance program.
Can members and business accounts use the same workspace?
People and organizations can be screened with the appropriate entity type and compatible sources. Your institution defines the related parties and checkpoints required for each relationship.
Is daily monitoring always the required interval?
A product schedule is not a universal legal mandate. Select cadence and event triggers under the institution’s applicable requirements and risk-based policy.
Can a reviewer explain an earlier dismissal?
Retained cases keep the original screening context and later reasoning. The quality of that explanation still depends on the evidence and notes entered by the review team.
See SanctionsKit in action
Explore screening and review for credit unions.
Try the interactive demo with synthetic examples. Compare plans for your team’s screening volume.